🔗 Share this article

Tomas Anez Dos Santos worked in a modest clearing within in the of Peru Amazon when he noticed footsteps approaching through the lush jungle.

It dawned on him he was encircled, and stood still.

“A single individual positioned, directing with an bow and arrow,” he remembers. “Unexpectedly he detected of my presence and I began to run.”

He ended up confronting the Mashco Piro. Over many years, Tomas—residing in the modest settlement of Nueva Oceania—served as virtually a local to these wandering tribe, who shun interaction with outsiders.

An updated document from a human rights organization indicates remain at least 196 of what it calls “remote communities” left in the world. This tribe is thought to be the most numerous. The report claims a significant portion of these groups could be decimated over the coming ten years unless authorities don't do additional measures to safeguard them.

It claims the greatest risks stem from deforestation, extraction or drilling for oil. Remote communities are highly vulnerable to ordinary illness—consequently, the study says a risk is posed by contact with evangelical missionaries and social media influencers looking for clicks.

In recent times, Mashco Piro people have been appearing to Nueva Oceania with greater frequency, based on accounts from locals.

The village is a fishing village of several clans, located atop on the banks of the Tauhamanu River in the center of the Peruvian jungle, half a day from the closest village by canoe.

The territory is not designated as a preserved zone for remote communities, and timber firms operate here.

Tomas says that, on occasion, the noise of industrial tools can be noticed continuously, and the tribe members are witnessing their forest disturbed and devastated.

In Nueva Oceania, people state they are divided. They dread the projectiles but they hold strong admiration for their “relatives” who live in the woodland and want to defend them.

“Let them live according to their traditions, we are unable to alter their culture. That's why we maintain our distance,” states Tomas.

Residents in Nueva Oceania are anxious about the damage to the tribe's survival, the threat of violence and the possibility that timber workers might introduce the community to diseases they have no resistance to.

At the time in the community, the tribe made themselves known again. Letitia, a resident with a young daughter, was in the woodland picking fruit when she heard them.

“There were cries, cries from individuals, numerous of them. As though there was a large gathering yelling,” she informed us.

It was the initial occasion she had encountered the Mashco Piro and she ran. After sixty minutes, her head was persistently pounding from fear.

“As there are timber workers and companies destroying the woodland they're running away, possibly because of dread and they come in proximity to us,” she explained. “We are uncertain what their response may be towards us. This is what scares me.”

Recently, a pair of timber workers were assaulted by the Mashco Piro while angling. One was wounded by an projectile to the abdomen. He recovered, but the other man was located deceased subsequently with several injuries in his physique.

Authorities in Peru has a approach of no engagement with secluded communities, making it illegal to initiate encounters with them.

This approach began in the neighboring country following many years of lobbying by indigenous rights groups, who observed that first interaction with remote tribes resulted to entire groups being decimated by sickness, hardship and malnutrition.

Back in the eighties, when the Nahau people in Peru made initial contact with the world outside, half of their population died within a matter of years. During the 1990s, the Muruhanua people suffered the same fate.

“Remote tribes are very vulnerable—in terms of health, any contact could introduce diseases, and even the basic infections might decimate them,” says an advocate from a tribal support group. “From a societal perspective, any exposure or disruption could be highly damaging to their way of life and well-being as a group.”

For local residents of {